Skip to content

AIgenTXS / AI Compute + Inference

Know what ran before value is released.

AIgenTXS is designed to connect a compute mandate with the permitted workload, evidence of delivery, and reconciliation of the observed result. A provider’s report is an input to review, not independent proof by itself.

AI Compute + InferenceArchitecture study
From workload to witnessed effectAdmission / metering / reconciliation
Workload admission, metering, and settlement.Illustrative industry design / AIgenTXS architecture

Why this workflow needs a record

A receipt is only as strong as its evidence.

An inference request carries more than a model name. Budget, region, data-handling restrictions, image identity, and metering all shape the permitted workload. Keep those terms attached through delivery so a reviewer can distinguish what was requested, reported, and independently observed.

Inside the workflow

Different decisions.
The same discipline.

Choose a scenario to inspect the proposed action, governing rule, evidence, and person responsible.

The proposed action

Review a confidential inference workload before dispatch.

Illustrative workflow. No live action.

Policy
Check the approved model, image, region, and workload budget.
Evidence
Model and image digests, tenant mandate, and data-handling conditions.
Reviewer
Tenant workload authority.
Effect record
Compare the admitted workload with the execution evidence from a configured receiver.

An interactive policy example

Change the context.
See what must change next.

Adjust one sample input, declare the evidence, and record a simulated approval. A boundary failure remains a failure even when approval is checked.

Sample compute mandate$20,000

AIgenTXS / policy exampleLocal only
Evidence missing

Held for supporting evidence.

Still needed: independent delivery evidence attached.

Named reviewerTenant finance reviewer
Execution grantNone
External effectNo action taken

Illustrative inputs and one simplified policy rule. Calculated in this browser; no upload, stored decision record, provider call, or external action. This is not a deployed industry workflow.

What stays attached

Evidence. Authority.
An inspectable outcome.

The evidence

  • Mandate, model digest, and workload identity
  • Region and data-handling restrictions
  • Meter observations and reconciliation differences

The authority

The tenant defines the permitted workload and spending scope. The model or provider cannot enlarge that mandate.

The effect

Reconciliation distinguishes an accepted request, reported completion, and witnessed delivery. Payment or settlement requires its own authorized pathway.

Start with one workflow

Bring the action.
Map the boundary.

Tell us what your team needs to govern, which evidence matters, and who owns the decision.

Current scopeIllustrative industry design. No workload is submitted, compute purchased, meter verified, or payment settled by this page.

AIgenTXS’s mandate-to-effect architecture is implemented and tested in-repository with synthetic fixtures. Product runtime deployment, customer use, and independent attestation are separate milestones.

Read the architecture and evidence status

Explore another industryRobotics + Physical Ops