SigmaX
FOR FINANCIAL PLATFORMS

Add an authority state between AI-generated intelligence and downstream action.

Platforms can generate research, insights, tasks, model changes, and recommendations. The unresolved boundary is whether the resulting capital action is permitted, sufficiently evidenced, and authorized—and who remains responsible for that determination.

SigmaX exposes no execution endpoint and does not submit orders, move money, custody assets, or decide suitability on behalf of the client. The platform and its customers retain their existing regulated responsibilities and authority boundaries.

The current gap

Intelligence and execution systems still lack a neutral decision-authority object.

01

A recommendation is not permission

An AI agent, proposal engine, portfolio tool, or adviser workflow can produce a useful action without proving that the account, mandate, policy, and evidence permit it.

02

Responsibility boundaries blur

As platforms add AI and workflow automation, clients need a clear line between generating an idea, validating requirements, authorizing it, and executing it.

03

Audit context breaks across APIs

The evidence, required approver, policy result, exception, route state, and final disposition are often represented differently—or not at all—across systems.

What SigmaX changes

Embed governed authority without becoming the broker, adviser, or compliance decision-maker.

Portable ActionIntent object

Return the proposed action, evidence state, mandate and policy result, required approver, route eligibility, impact reference, and audit reference in one governed shape.

Fail-closed workflow states

A proposal can be allowed, approval-required, held, blocked, paper-ready, or draft-handoff ready. Missing proof does not silently become permission.

Human authority remains explicit

The model or platform never inherits the principal’s authority. A named person approves, holds, or blocks according to the client’s configured workflow.

Clean partner boundary

SigmaX supplies the decision-control and evidence object while execution, custody, suitability, advice, and legal responsibility remain with the appropriate parties.

BOUNDED FIRST WORKFLOW

Pressure-test the object on one platform workflow.

Use one bounded scenario: an AI-generated adviser task, model update, rebalance proposal, client exception, investment recommendation, or portfolio-system handoff. The question is build, partner, adjacent, or unnecessary—not a forced integration.

  1. 01

    Define the proposal boundary

    Identify what the existing platform produces and the exact point at which the output could influence a capital-linked workflow.

  2. 02

    Shape the authority object

    Map the evidence, mandate, policy, approver, exception, route, and audit fields the downstream system actually needs.

  3. 03

    Evaluate integration cost

    Test a read-only API or sample payload without production credentials, execution endpoints, or customer-capital access.

  4. 04

    Choose the commercial boundary

    Determine whether SigmaX should be embedded, remain adjacent, support a lighthouse client, or be rejected because the platform already solves the problem.

The first review

Decide whether ActionIntent is a missing platform primitive.

Start with one completed, de-identified decision. No production integration, system credentials, trading access, custody access, or change to existing authority is required to determine whether the control gap is real.

What it should prove
  • Whether the platform can currently represent permission separately from recommendation
  • Whether required human authority and exception state survive downstream handoffs
  • Whether every factual claim and control result can carry provenance and a version
  • Whether the integration adds governance without adding execution or advice liability
  • Whether a shared lighthouse client can validate demand before a larger build
Compliance disclaimer

SigmaX provides capital decision intelligence, scenario analysis, and authority workflow software. SigmaX does not provide investment advice. SigmaX does not place trades, move funds, route customer capital, or manage client capital. Shadow/simulated/paper/backtested results are not live trading results. No result is a guarantee of future performance. Human approval is required before any capital-linked action.

Where SigmaX uses AI, it is governed as assistive software: truthful capability claims, human oversight, traceable records, disclosure of AI assistance, and no capital authority. SigmaX designs AI controls with reference to applicable securities obligations, FINRA existing-rule guidance, SEC AI-claims discipline, NIST AI RMF-style risk management, and EU AI Act transparency readiness. This is compliance-readiness design, not a claim that every deployment or jurisdiction-specific use has completed legal review.