Structured Workflow Support for Advisor and Suitability Review.
Fiduciary Advisor structures the advisor and suitability review process: client objective mapping, portfolio suitability checks, and documentation support for the fiduciary workflow. All outputs require operator review and do not constitute investment advice.
Workflow support and documentation tooling only. Not investment advice. Not a substitute for qualified legal or compliance counsel.
An evidence-structured support layer for the fiduciary review process.
Fiduciary review in an advisory context requires a structured, documented record: client objectives are mapped to portfolio construction, suitability is assessed against those objectives, and the rationale is preserved for review. That process is often manual, narrative, and difficult to audit consistently.
Fiduciary Advisor provides workflow support for that process: structured templates for client objective capture, an evidence-linked suitability assessment that connects to the Knowledge Galaxy thesis graph, and documentation scaffolding designed for investment-committee or compliance consumption. Every output is a typed record, not a free-text summary.
Fiduciary Advisor is not investment advice, not a licensed advisor, and not a substitute for qualified legal or compliance counsel. It provides workflow structure and documentation support. Capital authority, execution authority, and formal fiduciary responsibility remain with the licensed advisor or institution. All outputs are operator-reviewed before use.
From objective mapping to reviewable documentation.
Five stages from client objective capture to a documented fiduciary review record.
- 01Client objective mapping
Structured templates capture client objectives, risk tolerance, time horizon, and any expressed constraints. Inputs are typed — not free text — so they can be compared against portfolio construction in a consistent, reviewable format.
- 02Portfolio suitability assessment
Current or proposed portfolio composition is checked against the mapped client objectives. The assessment surfaces mismatches — positions or exposures that fall outside the stated objective parameters — as typed findings for operator review.
- 03Knowledge Galaxy linkage
Suitability findings are linked to the relevant thesis nodes in Knowledge Galaxy. The advisor can see not only that a position is outside objective parameters, but which thesis supports it and what the evidence basis is — a more complete picture for a fiduciary conversation.
- 04Drift Radar integration
Mandate drift detected by Drift Radar is surfaced in the Fiduciary Advisor workflow. When a portfolio drifts from the client objective mapping, the advisor receives a structured alert — before the quarterly review, not after.
- 05Documentation scaffolding
Review outputs — suitability findings, objective mappings, drift alerts, and the evidence basis for each position — are packaged as structured documentation ready for investment-committee, compliance, or client review. Format is designed for institutional consumption.
For advisors and fiduciaries who need a structured process record.
Structure the suitability documentation process with typed records rather than narrative notes. The workflow support produces a consistent, reviewable output for every client engagement.
Map client mandates to portfolio construction in a format that can be reviewed against live positions. Drift Radar integration means mandate drift surfaces between scheduled reviews — not only at them.
Produce documentation-ready fiduciary review outputs without a large compliance infrastructure. The structured templates and evidence linkage provide a defensible process record.
Review structured suitability findings and fiduciary documentation in a consistent format. Evidence-linked outputs reduce the time required to verify that advisory decisions have a documented rationale.
Capabilities and service tiers.
- Structured client objective mapping templates (typed, not free text)
- Portfolio suitability assessment against mapped objectives
- Knowledge Galaxy linkage: suitability findings connect to the thesis evidence graph
- Drift Radar integration: mandate drift surfaces in the fiduciary workflow
- Documentation scaffolding for investment-committee or compliance review
- Typed output records — every finding carries a source and a timestamp
- Fiduciary findings review workshop available when requested
- Independent diligence: overfit checks, execution-cost restatement, drift monitoring
An independent findings review workshop, run when requested: overfit and leakage checks, execution-cost restatement, drift review, and written findings with limits clearly stated. Built for operators who want a skeptical second opinion on the same evidence discipline SigmaX applies to itself.
Structure your fiduciary review process.
Fiduciary Advisor workflow support is available in Authority Team and Institutional platform plans. The findings review workshop is a one-time engagement, run when requested. Institutional engagements reviewed individually.
Not investment advice. Not a substitute for qualified legal or compliance counsel. Workflow support and documentation tooling only. Capital authority and formal fiduciary responsibility remain with the licensed advisor or institution.
SigmaX provides capital decision intelligence, scenario analysis, and authority workflow software. SigmaX does not provide investment advice. SigmaX does not place trades, move funds, route customer capital, or manage client capital. Shadow/simulated/paper/backtested results are not live trading results. No result is a guarantee of future performance. Human approval is required before any capital-linked action.
Where SigmaX uses AI, it is governed as assistive software: truthful capability claims, human oversight, traceable records, disclosure of AI assistance, and no capital authority. SigmaX designs AI controls with reference to applicable securities obligations, FINRA existing-rule guidance, SEC AI-claims discipline, NIST AI RMF-style risk management, and EU AI Act transparency readiness. This is compliance-readiness design, not a claim that every deployment or jurisdiction-specific use has completed legal review.